A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst possible neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal website in a north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated national interest pursuing an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier plus the Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed right into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, request to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of established people. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental law. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, notably in a delicate coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially created, is in the correct posture. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, exactly where sights of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances, an image that has because grow to be emblematic in the intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they ended up intended to gather Visible evidence in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations noted, describing how The 2 men entered the water all through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the site became One of the more putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that these types of steps have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on no matter if interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute in the legal timeline.
For the core of the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of setting up documents, maps, and problems connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by problem for René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private look at, insisting rather that it is about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few only wanting to establish a family members property in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that every one works have been completed according to professional suggestions and permitted ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean in the course of a storm, usually do not change the underlying points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above design of wall at coastal web page is becoming a shorthand description for any situation a large number of observers see as progressively common. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier noted which the businessman had Formerly been linked to nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from incredibly distinct Qualified backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded through waistline-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting both equally the Bodily reality of your coastline and the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal approach.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains uncertain. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing disorders. Still the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another very long after the legal fees happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend beyond that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Furthermore, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when essential issues like environmental safety and home rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre on the dispute stands partially constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter if it can finally be altered, eliminated, or completed as planned will rely upon the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.