A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, find to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly designed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their view, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are each remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image which includes since turn into emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they have been meant to Assemble Visible evidence of the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o throughout critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site turned one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail by the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important René Collier moment in the lawful timeline.
On the core of your dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as built, goes past what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and conditions attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is inspired by problem for environmental protection and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few basically trying to produce a household house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one functions are performed determined by Expert guidance and permitted plans. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into the sea during a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above development of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for any circumstance that many observers see as significantly common. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Moments article about René Collier famous the businessman experienced previously been involved with community advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from really distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded via waistline-high h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both of those the Actual physical fact with the coastline and also the symbolic character of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result continues to be uncertain. The court docket will have to figure out whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Region of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling ailments. Nonetheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who need to Are living alongside one another prolonged after the authorized prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building is effective at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the case lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues including environmental safety and house rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of normal magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Whether it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most intently watched setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.